Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dimir Bounce | enter | 9-1 | 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 64 #12763190 |
| Esper Pixie | kthanakit26 | 9-1 | 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12769881 |
| Esper Pixie | houseofmanamtg | 7-2 | 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12765757 |
| Esper Pixie | gyrabbit47 | 7-2 | 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12765778 |
| Temur Otters | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Esper Pixie | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Orzhov Pixie | sam_lewin | 7-2 | None |
| Unknown Archetype | elvin7 | 7-2 | None |
| Esper Pixie | ejk | 6-1 | None |
| Esper Pixie | mei0024 | 6-1 | None |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
4 Color Repurposing , Abzan Midrange , Abzan Pixie , Dimir Bounce , Dimir Control , Dimir Midrange , Dimir Repurposing , Esper Paragon , Esper Pixie , Esper Repurposing
Meta Performance Analysis
Grim Bauble ranks #71 out of approximately 406 cards in raw efficiency (top 17%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Black average: 74.5%
Performance compared to other Black cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Grim Bauble is a solid card that performs above average in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 3
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 45.34 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 1 mana, the average win rate in the format is 76.0%. Grim Bauble has a win rate of 72.9%, making it 4.0% worse than other 1-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dissection Tools | Artifact — Equipment | 6 | 72.9% | 3 |
| The Mightstone and Weakstone | Legendary Artifact — Powerstone | 9 | 67.1% | 6 |
| Bandit's Talent | Enchantment — Class | 7 | 65.2% | 1 |
| Sunpearl Kirin | Creature — Kirin | 38 | 62.9% | 8 |
| Archfiend of the Dross | Creature — Phyrexian Demon | 7 | 62.9% | 3 |
| The Filigree Sylex | Legendary Artifact | 10 | 61.2% | 6 |
| Collector's Vault | Artifact | 5 | 60.0% | 4 |
| Overlord of the Mistmoors | Enchantment Creature — Avatar Horror | 11 | 59.2% | 0 |
| The Enigma Jewel | Legendary Artifact // Legendary Artifact | 13 | 56.6% | 7 |
| Wilt-Leaf Liege | Creature — Elf Knight | 19 | 56.3% | 1 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Grim Bauble than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sheltered by Ghosts | Enchantment — Aura | 2 | 8 | 83.0% | 75.3% | +7.7% |
| Scavenger Regent | Creature — Dragon | 4 | 5 | 77.3% | 70.4% | +6.9% |
| Negate | Instant | 2 | 24 | 79.1% | 73.9% | +5.2% |
| Spell Pierce | Instant | 1 | 22 | 80.1% | 75.0% | +5.1% |
| Get Out | Instant | 2 | 21 | 79.5% | 75.7% | +3.8% |
| Tishana's Tidebinder | Creature — Merfolk Wizard | 3 | 32 | 76.5% | 72.9% | +3.6% |
| Kaito, Bane of Nightmares | Legendary Planeswalker — Kaito | 4 | 88 | 75.8% | 72.8% | +3.0% |
| Cori-Steel Cutter | Artifact — Equipment | 2 | 5 | 78.4% | 75.5% | +2.9% |
| Floodpits Drowner | Creature — Merfolk | 2 | 26 | 75.6% | 72.8% | +2.8% |
| Cut Down | Instant | 1 | 34 | 76.0% | 73.4% | +2.6% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Esper Pixie | 726 | 46.5% | 54.7% |
| Dimir Bounce | 169 | 34.2% | 60.0% |
| Orzhov Pixie | 60 | 82.2% | 55.3% |
| Dimir Midrange | 27 | 1.3% | 52.8% |
| Unknown Archetype | 21 | 5.8% | 44.3% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.